[Name of defendant] is not responsible for [name of plaintiff]’s harm
if [he/she] proves that [name of plaintiff]’s harm resulted from [his/
her] entry on or use of [name of defendant]’s property for a
recreational purpose,[Choose one of the following three options:][unless [name of plaintiff] proves all of the following:
1. That [name of defendant] knew or should have known of the
[condition/use/structure/activity on the property] that
created an unreasonable risk of serious injury;
2. That [name of defendant] knew or should have known that
someone would probably be seriously injured by the
dangerous [condition/use/structure/activity]; and
3. That [name of defendant] knowingly failed to protect others
from the dangerous [condition/use/structure/activity].]
[or]
[unless [name of plaintiff] proves that a charge or fee was paid to
[name of defendant] to use the property.]
[or]
[unless [name of plaintiff] proves that [name of defendant] expressly
invited [name of plaintiff] to use the property for the recreational
purpose.]
If you have a legal issue in California which involves What is the Law in California for the Premises Liability Defense of Recreation Immunity, call the Law Firm of Attorney Sebastian Gibson. With over thirty years of experience in the U.S. and internationally, California Civil Lawyer Sebastian Gibson is the attorney to call for all your legal matters in the State of California.
We invite you to explore the web site of California Lawyer Sebastian Gibson and see how we can assist you in other areas of federal and state law as well.