What Is Contract Defense of Economic Duress Law in California

What is the Law in California for the Contract Defense of Economic Duress- California Civil Jury Instruction CACI 333

California Law

CA Civil Jury Instructions

CACI 333 - Contract Defense of Economic Duress

As of September 1, 2010

California Civil Jury Instruction CACI 333

333. Affirmative Defense—Economic Duress

[Name of defendant] claims that there was no contract because [his/

her/its] consent was given under duress. To succeed, [name of
defendant] must prove all of the following:

1. That [name of plaintiff] used a wrongful act or wrongful

threat to pressure [name of defendant] into consenting to the

contract;

2. That a reasonable person in [name of defendant]’s position

would have felt that he or she had no reasonable

alternative except to consent to the contract; and

3. That [name of defendant] would not have consented to the

contract without the wrongful act or wrongful threat.

An act or a threat is wrongful if [insert relevant rule, e.g., "a badfaith
breach of contract is threatened"].

If you decide that [name of defendant] has proved all of the above,

then no contract was created.

If you have a legal issue in California which involves What is the Law in California for the Contract Defense of Economic Duress, call the Law Firm of Attorney Sebastian Gibson. With over thirty years of experience in the U.S. and internationally, California Civil Lawyer Sebastian Gibson is the attorney to call for all your legal matters in the State of California.

We invite you to explore the web site of California Lawyer Sebastian Gibson and see how we can assist you in other areas of federal and state law as well.

What Is Contract Defense of Economic Duress Law in California

What is the Law in California for the Contract Defense of Economic Duress- California Civil Jury Instruction CACI 333

California Law

CA Civil Jury Instructions

CACI 333 - Contract Defense of Economic Duress

As of September 1, 2010

California Civil Jury Instruction CACI 333

333. Affirmative Defense—Economic Duress

[Name of defendant] claims that there was no contract because [his/

her/its] consent was given under duress. To succeed, [name of defendant] must prove all of the following:

defendant] must prove all of the following:

1. That [name of plaintiff] used a wrongful act or wrongful

threat to pressure [name of defendant] into consenting to the

contract;

2. That a reasonable person in [name of defendant]’s position

would have felt that he or she had no reasonable

alternative except to consent to the contract; and

3. That [name of defendant] would not have consented to the

contract without the wrongful act or wrongful threat.

An act or a threat is wrongful if [insert relevant rule, e.g., "a badfaith breach of contract is threatened"].

breach of contract is threatened"].

If you decide that [name of defendant] has proved all of the above,

then no contract was created.

We invite you to explore the web site of California Lawyer Sebastian Gibson and see how we can assist you in other areas of federal and state law as well.

What is the Law

her/its] consent was given under duress. To succeed, [name of
defendant] must prove all of the following:

An act or a threat is wrongful if [insert relevant rule, e.g., "a badfaith
breach of contract is threatened"].